Preview

Лечащий Врач

Расширенный поиск

Сравнительная эффективность предикторов преждевременных родов

Полный текст:

Аннотация

В обзоре представлены данные об эффективности применения предикторов преждевременных родов. Проведен обзор публикаций базы данных Национальной библиотеки медицины PubMed в период с 2014 по 2019 гг. с использованием следующих условий поиска: беременность, факторы риска и прогнозирование преждевременных родов. Предложены предикторы преждевременных родов, делающие возможным с высокой долей вероятности предположить срок родоразрешения в течение 7 дней.

Об авторах

О. В. Яковлева
ФГБОУ ВО СГМУ им. В. И. Разумовского МЗ РФ
Россия


Т. Н. Глухова
ФГБОУ ВО СГМУ им. В. И. Разумовского МЗ РФ
Россия


Список литературы

1. Liu L., Oza S., Hogan D. et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals // Lancet. 2016; 388 (10063): 3027–3035. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140–6736(16)31593–8.

2. Desplanches T., Lejeune C., Cottenet J. et al. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tests for threatened preterm labor in singleton pregnancy in France // Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018; 16: 21. Published 2018 Jun 14. DOI: 10.1186/s12962-018-0106-y. https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6003030/.

3. Benoist G. Prediction of preterm delivery in symptomatic women (preterm labor) // J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris). 2016; 45 (10): 1346–1363. DOI: 10.1016/j. jgyn.2016.09.025. Epub 2016 Oct 29.

4. Department of Health (2018) Clinical Practice Guidelines: Pregnancy Care. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health. https://beta. health.gov.au/resources/pregnancy-care-guidelines/part-d-clinical-assessments/risk-of-preterm-birth.

5. Oskovi Kaplan Z. A., Ozgu-Erdinc A. S. Prediction of preterm birth: maternal characteristics, ultrasound markers, and biomarkers: an updated overview // J. Pregnancy. 2018, Oct 10; 2018: 8367571. DOI: 10.1155/2018/8367571. eCollection 2018.

6. Jelliffe-Pawlowski L. L., Baer R. J., Blumenfeld Y. J. et al. Maternal characteristics and mid-pregnancy serum biomarkers as risk factors for subtypes of preterm birth // BJOG. 2015; 122 (11): 1484–1493. DOI: 10.1111/1471–0528.13495. Epub 2015 Jun 26.

7. Shin D., Song W. O. Prepregnancy body mass index is an independent risk factor for gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, preterm labor, and small- and large-for-gestational-age infants // J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2015; 28 (14): 1679–1686. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2014.964675. Epub 2014 Sep 29.

8. Kim J. I., Cho M. O., Choi G. Y. Multiple factors in the second trimester of pregnancy on preterm labor symptoms and preterm birth // J. Korean. Acad. Nurs. 2017; 47 (3): 357–366. DOI: 10.4040/jkan.2017.47.3.357.

9. Goldstein R. F., Abell S. K., Ranasinha S. et al. Association of gestational weight gain with maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis // JAMA. 2017 Jun 6; 317 (21): 2207–2225. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.3635.

10. Hiersch L., Yogev Y., Domniz N. et al. The role of cervical length in women with threatened preterm labor: is it a valid predictor at any gestational age? // Am J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 211 (5): 532. DOI: 10.1016/j. ajog.2014.06.002. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

11. Melamed N., Hiersch L., Meizner I. et al. Is measurement of cervical length an accurate predictive tool in women with a history of preterm delivery who present with threatened preterm labor? // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 44 (6): 661–668. DOI: 10.1002/uog.13395. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

12. Palacio M., Caradeux J., S?nchez M. et al. Uterine cervical length measurement to reduce length of stay in patients admitted for threatened preterm labor: a randomized trial // Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2018; 43 (3): 184–190. DOI: 10.1159/000477930. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

13. Melamed N., Hiersch L., Gabbay-Benziv R. et al. Predictive value of cervical length in women with twin pregnancy presenting with threatened preterm labor // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 46 (1): 73–81. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14665.

14. Desplanches T., Lejeune C., Cottenet J. et al. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tests for threatened preterm labor in singleton pregnancy in France // Cost. Eff. Resour. Alloc. 2018 Jun 14; 16:21. DOI: 10.1186/s12962–018–0106-y. eCollection 2018.

15. Agarwal S., Agarwal A., Joon P. et al. Fetal adrenal gland biometry and cervical elastography as predictors of preterm birth: a comparative study // Ultrasound. 2018; 26 (1): 54–62. DOI: 10.1177/1742271X17748515. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

16. Swiatkowska-Freund M., Preis K. Cervical elastography during pregnancy: clinical perspectives // Int. J. Womens Health. 2017 Apr 21; 9: 245–254. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH. S106321. eCollection 2017.

17. Fruscalzo A., Mazza E., Feltovich H. et al. Cervical elastography during pregnancy: a critical review of current approaches with a focus on controversies and limitations // J. Med. Ultrason. 2016; 43 (4): 493–504. DOI: 10.1007/s10396-016-0723-z. Epub 2016 Jun 3.

18. Hernandez-Andrade E., Maymon E., Luewan S. et al. A soft cervix, categorized by shear-wave elastography, in women with short or with normal cervical length at 18–24 weeks is associated with a higher prevalence of spontaneous preterm delivery // J. Perinat. Med. 2018 Jul 26; 46 (5): 489–501. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2018-0062.

19. Lemos A. P., Feitosa F. E., Araujo J?nior E. et al. Delivery prediction in pregnant women with spontaneous preterm birth using fetal adrenal gland biometry // J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2016; 29 (23): 3756–3761. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1147556. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

20. Hoffman M. K., Turan O. M., Parker C. B. et al. Ultrasound measurement of the fetal adrenal gland as a predictor of spontaneous preterm birth // Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 127 (4): 726–734. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001342.

21. Park H., Park K. H., Kim Y. M. et al. Plasma inflammatory and immune proteins as predictors of intra-amniotic infection and spontaneous preterm delivery in women with preterm labor: a retrospective study // BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 9; 18 (1): 146. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1780-7.

22. Kook S. Y., Park K. H., Jang J. A. et al. Vitamin D-binding protein in cervicovaginal fluid as a non-invasive predictor of intra-amniotic infection and impending preterm delivery in women with preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes // PLoS One. 2018 Jun 7; 13 (6): 0198842. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0198842. eCollection 2018.

23. Di Fabrizio L., Giardina I., Cetin I. et al. New methods for preterm birth prediction: the PAMG-1 test // Minerva Ginecol. 2018; 70 (5): 635–640. DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04243-0. Epub 2018 May 31.

24. Melchor J. C., Navas H., Marcos M. et al. Predictive performance of PAMG-1 vs fFN test for risk of spontaneous preterm birth in symptomatic women attending an emergency obstetric unit: retrospective cohort study // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2018 May; 51 (5): 644–649. DOI: 10.1002/uog.18892. Epub 2018 Mar 26.

25. Ravi M., Beljorie M., Masry K. Evaluation of the quantitative fetal fibronectin test and PAMG-1 test for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of preterm labor // J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2018, May 28: 1–6. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1476485.

26. ?ekmez Y., Kiran G., Haberal E. T. et al. Use of cervicovaginal PAMG-1 protein as a predictor of delivery within seven days in pregnancies at risk of premature birth // BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017, Jul 26; 17 (1): 246. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017–1427–0.

27. Santipap M., Phupong V. Combination of three-dimensional ultrasound measurement of foetal adrenal gland enlargement and placental alpha microglobulin-1 for the prediction of the timing of delivery within seven days in women with threatened preterm labour and preterm labour // J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2018 Mar 23: 1–6. DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1446422.

28. Nikolova T., Uotila J., Nikolova N. et al. Prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery in women presenting with premature labor: a comparison of placenta alpha microglobulin-1, phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1, and cervical length // Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219 (6):610. e1–610. e9. DOI: 10.1016/j. ajog.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

29. Kosinska-Kaczynska K., Szymusik I., Bomba-Opon D. et al. Rapid cervical phIGFBP-1 test in asymptomatic twin pregnancies is inefficient in predicting preterm delivery prior to 34 gestational weeks // Ginekol Pol. 2018; 89 (6): 321–325. DOI: 10.5603/GP. a2018.0055.

30. Melchor J. C., Khalil A., Wing D. et al. Prediction of preterm delivery in symptomatic women using PAMG-1, fetal fibronectin and phIGFBP-1 tests: systematic review and meta-analysis // Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 52 (4): 442–451. DOI: 10.1002/uog.19119. Epub 2018 Sep 4.

31. Mal?ckov? K., Kouck? M., Par?zek A. et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of presepsin in preterm deliveries // J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2015; 28 (9): 1032–1037. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2014.942627. Epub 2014 Jul 28.О. В. Яковлева1, кандидат медицинских наук


Рецензия

Для цитирования:


Яковлева О.В., Глухова Т.Н. Сравнительная эффективность предикторов преждевременных родов. Лечащий Врач. 2019;(3):52.

For citation:


Yakovleva O.V., Glukhova T.N. Comparative effectiveness of predictors of preterm labor. Lechaschi Vrach. 2019;(3):52. (In Russ.)

Просмотров: 39


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International.


ISSN 1560-5175 (Print)
ISSN 2687-1181 (Online)