Сравнительная эффективность предикторов преждевременных родов
Аннотация
В обзоре представлены данные об эффективности применения предикторов преждевременных родов. Проведен обзор публикаций базы данных Национальной библиотеки медицины PubMed в период с 2014 по 2019 гг. с использованием следующих условий поиска: беременность, факторы риска и прогнозирование преждевременных родов. Предложены предикторы преждевременных родов, делающие возможным с высокой долей вероятности предположить срок родоразрешения в течение 7 дней.
Ключевые слова
Об авторах
О. В. ЯковлеваРоссия
Т. Н. Глухова
Россия
Список литературы
1. Liu L., Oza S., Hogan D. et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals // Lancet. 2016; 388 (10063): 3027–3035. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140–6736(16)31593–8.
2. Desplanches T., Lejeune C., Cottenet J. et al. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tests for threatened preterm labor in singleton pregnancy in France // Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018; 16: 21. Published 2018 Jun 14. DOI: 10.1186/s12962-018-0106-y. https://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6003030/.
3. Benoist G. Prediction of preterm delivery in symptomatic women (preterm labor) // J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris). 2016; 45 (10): 1346–1363. DOI: 10.1016/j. jgyn.2016.09.025. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
4. Department of Health (2018) Clinical Practice Guidelines: Pregnancy Care. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health. https://beta. health.gov.au/resources/pregnancy-care-guidelines/part-d-clinical-assessments/risk-of-preterm-birth.
5. Oskovi Kaplan Z. A., Ozgu-Erdinc A. S. Prediction of preterm birth: maternal characteristics, ultrasound markers, and biomarkers: an updated overview // J. Pregnancy. 2018, Oct 10; 2018: 8367571. DOI: 10.1155/2018/8367571. eCollection 2018.
6. Jelliffe-Pawlowski L. L., Baer R. J., Blumenfeld Y. J. et al. Maternal characteristics and mid-pregnancy serum biomarkers as risk factors for subtypes of preterm birth // BJOG. 2015; 122 (11): 1484–1493. DOI: 10.1111/1471–0528.13495. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
7. Shin D., Song W. O. Prepregnancy body mass index is an independent risk factor for gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, preterm labor, and small- and large-for-gestational-age infants // J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2015; 28 (14): 1679–1686. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2014.964675. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
8. Kim J. I., Cho M. O., Choi G. Y. Multiple factors in the second trimester of pregnancy on preterm labor symptoms and preterm birth // J. Korean. Acad. Nurs. 2017; 47 (3): 357–366. DOI: 10.4040/jkan.2017.47.3.357.
9. Goldstein R. F., Abell S. K., Ranasinha S. et al. Association of gestational weight gain with maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis // JAMA. 2017 Jun 6; 317 (21): 2207–2225. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.3635.
10. Hiersch L., Yogev Y., Domniz N. et al. The role of cervical length in women with threatened preterm labor: is it a valid predictor at any gestational age? // Am J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 211 (5): 532. DOI: 10.1016/j. ajog.2014.06.002. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
11. Melamed N., Hiersch L., Meizner I. et al. Is measurement of cervical length an accurate predictive tool in women with a history of preterm delivery who present with threatened preterm labor? // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 44 (6): 661–668. DOI: 10.1002/uog.13395. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
12. Palacio M., Caradeux J., S?nchez M. et al. Uterine cervical length measurement to reduce length of stay in patients admitted for threatened preterm labor: a randomized trial // Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2018; 43 (3): 184–190. DOI: 10.1159/000477930. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
13. Melamed N., Hiersch L., Gabbay-Benziv R. et al. Predictive value of cervical length in women with twin pregnancy presenting with threatened preterm labor // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 46 (1): 73–81. DOI: 10.1002/uog.14665.
14. Desplanches T., Lejeune C., Cottenet J. et al. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tests for threatened preterm labor in singleton pregnancy in France // Cost. Eff. Resour. Alloc. 2018 Jun 14; 16:21. DOI: 10.1186/s12962–018–0106-y. eCollection 2018.
15. Agarwal S., Agarwal A., Joon P. et al. Fetal adrenal gland biometry and cervical elastography as predictors of preterm birth: a comparative study // Ultrasound. 2018; 26 (1): 54–62. DOI: 10.1177/1742271X17748515. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
16. Swiatkowska-Freund M., Preis K. Cervical elastography during pregnancy: clinical perspectives // Int. J. Womens Health. 2017 Apr 21; 9: 245–254. DOI: 10.2147/IJWH. S106321. eCollection 2017.
17. Fruscalzo A., Mazza E., Feltovich H. et al. Cervical elastography during pregnancy: a critical review of current approaches with a focus on controversies and limitations // J. Med. Ultrason. 2016; 43 (4): 493–504. DOI: 10.1007/s10396-016-0723-z. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
18. Hernandez-Andrade E., Maymon E., Luewan S. et al. A soft cervix, categorized by shear-wave elastography, in women with short or with normal cervical length at 18–24 weeks is associated with a higher prevalence of spontaneous preterm delivery // J. Perinat. Med. 2018 Jul 26; 46 (5): 489–501. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2018-0062.
19. Lemos A. P., Feitosa F. E., Araujo J?nior E. et al. Delivery prediction in pregnant women with spontaneous preterm birth using fetal adrenal gland biometry // J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2016; 29 (23): 3756–3761. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1147556. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
20. Hoffman M. K., Turan O. M., Parker C. B. et al. Ultrasound measurement of the fetal adrenal gland as a predictor of spontaneous preterm birth // Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 127 (4): 726–734. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001342.
21. Park H., Park K. H., Kim Y. M. et al. Plasma inflammatory and immune proteins as predictors of intra-amniotic infection and spontaneous preterm delivery in women with preterm labor: a retrospective study // BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 9; 18 (1): 146. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-1780-7.
22. Kook S. Y., Park K. H., Jang J. A. et al. Vitamin D-binding protein in cervicovaginal fluid as a non-invasive predictor of intra-amniotic infection and impending preterm delivery in women with preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes // PLoS One. 2018 Jun 7; 13 (6): 0198842. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0198842. eCollection 2018.
23. Di Fabrizio L., Giardina I., Cetin I. et al. New methods for preterm birth prediction: the PAMG-1 test // Minerva Ginecol. 2018; 70 (5): 635–640. DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04243-0. Epub 2018 May 31.
24. Melchor J. C., Navas H., Marcos M. et al. Predictive performance of PAMG-1 vs fFN test for risk of spontaneous preterm birth in symptomatic women attending an emergency obstetric unit: retrospective cohort study // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2018 May; 51 (5): 644–649. DOI: 10.1002/uog.18892. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
25. Ravi M., Beljorie M., Masry K. Evaluation of the quantitative fetal fibronectin test and PAMG-1 test for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of preterm labor // J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2018, May 28: 1–6. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1476485.
26. ?ekmez Y., Kiran G., Haberal E. T. et al. Use of cervicovaginal PAMG-1 protein as a predictor of delivery within seven days in pregnancies at risk of premature birth // BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017, Jul 26; 17 (1): 246. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017–1427–0.
27. Santipap M., Phupong V. Combination of three-dimensional ultrasound measurement of foetal adrenal gland enlargement and placental alpha microglobulin-1 for the prediction of the timing of delivery within seven days in women with threatened preterm labour and preterm labour // J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2018 Mar 23: 1–6. DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1446422.
28. Nikolova T., Uotila J., Nikolova N. et al. Prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery in women presenting with premature labor: a comparison of placenta alpha microglobulin-1, phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1, and cervical length // Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219 (6):610. e1–610. e9. DOI: 10.1016/j. ajog.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
29. Kosinska-Kaczynska K., Szymusik I., Bomba-Opon D. et al. Rapid cervical phIGFBP-1 test in asymptomatic twin pregnancies is inefficient in predicting preterm delivery prior to 34 gestational weeks // Ginekol Pol. 2018; 89 (6): 321–325. DOI: 10.5603/GP. a2018.0055.
30. Melchor J. C., Khalil A., Wing D. et al. Prediction of preterm delivery in symptomatic women using PAMG-1, fetal fibronectin and phIGFBP-1 tests: systematic review and meta-analysis // Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 52 (4): 442–451. DOI: 10.1002/uog.19119. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
31. Mal?ckov? K., Kouck? M., Par?zek A. et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of presepsin in preterm deliveries // J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2015; 28 (9): 1032–1037. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2014.942627. Epub 2014 Jul 28.О. В. Яковлева1, кандидат медицинских наук
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Яковлева О.В., Глухова Т.Н. Сравнительная эффективность предикторов преждевременных родов. Лечащий Врач. 2019;(3):52.
For citation:
Yakovleva O.V., Glukhova T.N. Comparative effectiveness of predictors of preterm labor. Lechaschi Vrach. 2019;(3):52. (In Russ.)
JATS XML


















