Preview

Lechaschi Vrach

Advanced search

Post-viral dysosmia: therapeutic and diagnostic principles

https://doi.org/10.51793/OS.2022.25.4.009

Abstract

Violation of the sense of smell until recently did not belong to the most urgent problems of medicine. However, with the advent of the pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the interest of researchers and clinicians in olfactory dysfunction has increased many times around the world, which is explained by the highest incidence of dysosmia in COVID-19 – up to 50% of the total number of cases. According to the European consensus documents on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis, impaired sense of smell along with difficulty in nasal breathing, abnormal nasal discharge and headache are among the most common subjective signs of acute rhinosinusitis. According to expert estimates, the frequency of olfactory dysfunction in such patients reaches 14-30%. More than 80% of patients with acute sinusitis indicate a concomitant olfactory disorder. It usually recovers on average within two weeks from the onset of the disease. Dysosmia in patients of this group in 60-80% of cases is not accompanied by destruction of the olfactory epithelium, but is associated with edema of the mucous membrane and hypersecretion of mucus, which leads to the closure of the lumen of the narrow olfactory fissure. As part of this work, from June 2020 to December 2021, 32 patients aged 29 to 52 years (21 men and 11 women) without neurological diseases with postviral anosmia were under observation. Complaints about the complete lack of smell, discomfort in the root of the nose, nasality and the results of subjective olfactometry made it possible to establish the diagnosis of conductive anosmia in all patients. The patients received antibacterial therapy with a semi-synthetic third-generation cephalosporin antibiotic. In addition, the course of outpatient treatment included anemization of the upper sections of the nasal mucosa and physiotherapy. All patients tolerated the treatment well, no side effects were recorded. After a week, all patients noted an improvement in nasal breathing, the disappearance of nasality, and an improvement in the sense of smell. In the future, patients were recommended to independently conduct olfactory training for 3-4 months: inhalation of essential oils of rose, eucalyptus, lemon, clove, jasmine, orange and coffee.

About the Author

O. V. Zaytseva
Federal State Budgetary Institution The National Medical Research Center for Otorhinolaryngology of the Federal Medico-Biological Agency of Russia
Россия

Olga V. Zaytseva , MD, Head of the Scientific and Clinical Department and Head of the Department of Vestibulology and Otoneurology

30 b. 2, Volokolamskoe shosse, Moscow, 123182



References

1. Human Anatomy / Pod red. Sapina M. R. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2015. T. 2. P. 469.

2. Krayev A. V. Human anatomy. T. 2. M.: Meditsina, 1978. S. 352.

3. Hannum M. E., Ramirez V. A., Lipson S. J., Herriman R. D., Toskala A. K., Lin C., et al. Objective Sensory Testing Methods Reveal a Higher Prevalence of Olfactory Loss in COVID-19 – Positive Patients Compared to Subjective Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Chem Senses. 2020; 45 (9): 865-874.

4. European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyposis Rhinology // Rhinology. 2012; 50 (1): 1-12.

5. Savvateyeva D. M., Lopatin A. S. Diagnosis and treatment of olfactory dysfunction in patients with acute rhinosinusitis // Rossiyskaya rinologiya. 2010; 2: 8-11.

6. Dimov D. A. Violation of smell in diseases of the nasal cavity // Zhurn. ushn., nos. i gorl. bol. 1978; 4: 75-76.

7. Seiden A. M. Postviral olfactory loss // Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America. 2004; 6 (37): 1159-1166.

8. Doty R. L. Systemic diseases and disorders // Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 2019; 164: 361-387.

9. Gu J., Gong E., Zhang B. et al. Multiple organ infection and the pathogenesis of SARS // Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2005; 3 (202): 415-424.

10. Hummel T., Rissom K., Reden J., et al. Effects of olfactory training in patients with olfactory loss // Laryngoscope. 2009; 119 (3): 496-499.

11. Konstantinidis I., Tsakiropoulou E., Bekiaridou P., et al. Use of olfactory training in posttraumatic and postinfectious olfactory dysfunction // Laryngoscope. 2013; 123 (12): 85-90.

12. Altundag A., Cayonu M., Kayabasoglu G., et al. Modified olfactory training in patients with postinfectious olfactory loss // Laryngoscope. 2015; 125 (8): 1763-1766.

13. Kucers’ the use of antibiotics: a clinical review of antibacterial, antifungal, antiparasitic and antiviral drugs / [edited by] M. L. Grayson, S. E. Cosgrove, S. M. Crowe, W. Hope, J. S. Mccarthy, J. Mills, J. W. Mouton and D. L. Paterson. Seventh edition. Taylor & Francis Group, 2018. 4891 р.

14. Zyryanov S. K., Baybulatova Ye. A The use of new dosage forms of antibiotics as a way to improve the effectiveness and safety of antibiotic therapy. DOI: 10.24411/0235-2990-2019-10020.

15. WHO. Newsletter No. 331. Noyabr' 2015 g (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs331/ru/).

16. Konstantinidis I., Tsakiropoulou E., Constantinidis J. Long term effects of olfactory training in patients with post?infectious olfactory loss //Rhinology. 2016; 54 (2): 170-175.


Review

For citations:


Zaytseva O.V. Post-viral dysosmia: therapeutic and diagnostic principles. Lechaschi Vrach. 2022;(4):49-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51793/OS.2022.25.4.009

Views: 609

JATS XML

ISSN 1560-5175 (Print)
ISSN 2687-1181 (Online)