Adherence to treatment: influence on life quality and risk of repeated fractures in women in post-menopause after osteoporotic fracture
Abstract
In cohort of women in menopause after osteoporotic fractures of different localizations, adherence to anti-osteoporotic treatment was studied, and its influence on changes in life quality and risk of new fractures in the course of 3-year follow-up period was evaluated. It was defined that adherence to the treatment during 3 years accounted for 20%. Life quality in those patients who got antiosteoporotic treatment, was recovered authentically faster, and the risk of repeated fractures in the patients who didn’t get the therapy, was 3,5 times higher.
About the Authors
O. V. Dobrovolskaya
ФГБУ НИИР им. В. А. Насоновой РАМН
Россия
Россия
N. V. Toroptsova
ФГБУ НИИР им. В. А. Насоновой РАМН
Россия
Россия
References
1. Новик А. А., Ионова Т. И. Руководство по исследованию качества жизни в медицине / Под ред. Ю. Л. Шевченко. 2-е изд. М.: ОЛМА Медиа Групп, 2007. 320 с.
2. Cooper C., Jakob F., Chinn C. et al. Fracture incidence and changes in quality of life in women with an inadequate clinical outcome from osteoporosis therapy: the Observational Study of Severe Osteoporosis (OSSO) // Osteoporos Int. 2008; 19 (4): 493–501. DOI: 10.1007/s00198–007–0488–8.
3. Silverman S., Viswanathan H. N., Yang Y. C. et al. Impact of clinical fractures on health-related quality of life is dependent on time of assessment since fracture: results from the FREEDOM trial // Osteoporos Int. 2012; 23 (4): 1361–1369. DOI: 10.1007/s00198–011–1720–0.
4. Roux C., Wyman A., Hooven F. H. et al. Burden of non-hip, non-vertebral fractures on quality of life in postmenopausal women: the Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) // Osteoporos Int. 2012; 23 (12): 2863–2871. DOI: 10.1007/s00198–012–1935–8.
5. Adachi J. D., Adami S., Gehlbach S. et al. Impact of prevalent fractures on quality of life: baseline results from the global longitudinal study of osteoporosis in women // Mayo Clin Proc. 2010; 85 (9): 806–813. DOI: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0082.
6. Borgstr?m F., Zethraeus N., Johnell O. et al. Costs and quality of life associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden // Osteoporos Int. 2006; 17 (5): 637–650. DOI: 10.1007/s00198–005–0015–8.
7. Str?m O., Borgstrom F., Zethraeus N. et al. Long-term cost and effect on quality of life of osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden // Acta Orthop. 2008; 79 (2): 269–80. DOI: 10.1080/17453670710015094.
8. Hagino H., Nakamura T., Fujiwara S. et al. Sequential change in quality of life for patients with incident clinical fractures: a prospective study // Osteoporos Int. 2009; 20 (5): 695–702. DOI: 10.1007/s00198–008–0761–5.
9. Ekstr?m W., N?meth G., Samneg?rd E. et al. Quality of life after a subtrochanteric fracture: a prospective cohort study on 87 elderly patients // Injury. 2009; 40 (4): 371–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.09.010.
10. Меньшикова Л. В., Варавко Ю. О. Качество жизни больных с остеопоротическим переломом позвоночника // Сибирский медицинский журнал. 2011; 105 (6): 220–222.
11. Лесняк О. М., Бахтиярова С. А., Голобородько К. Н., Кузнецова Н. Л. Качество жизни при остеопорозе. Проспективное наблюдение пациентов, перенесших перелом проксимального отдела бедра // Остеопороз и остеопатии. 2007; № 3, с. 4–8.
12. Попов А. А., Изможерова Н. В., Гаврилова Е. И., Фоминых М. И. Оценка влияния перенесенных переломов лучевой кости на качество жизни жительниц Екатеринбурга, страдающих постменопаузальным остеопорозом // Остеопороз и остеопатии. 2007; № 3, с. 9–11.
13. Papaioannou A., Morin S., Cheung A. M. et al. 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary // CMAJ. 2010; 182 (17): 1864–1873. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.100771.
14. Lindsay R., Silverman S. L., Cooper C. et al. // JAMA. 200; 285 (3): 320–323.
15. Rubin K. H., Friis-Holmberg T., Hermann A. P. et al. Risk assessment tools to identify women with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture: complexity or simplicity? A systematic review // Bone Miner Res. 2013; 28 (8): 1701–1717. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1956.
16. Лесняк О. М., Ершова О. Б., Белова К. Ю. с соавт. Эпидемиология остеопоротических переломов в российской федерации и российская модель FRAX® // Остеопороз и остеопатии. 2014, № 3, с. 3–8.
17. Tamulaitiene M., Sinkeviciene V., Alekna V. et al. Health related quality of life 24 months after vertebral and distal forearm fracture in Lithuania // Osteoporos Int. 2013; 24 (S1): 324.
18. Sornay-Rendu E., Munoz F., Delmas P. D., Chapurlat R. D. The FRAX® tool in French women: How well does it describe the real incidence of fracture in the OFELY cohort? // J Bone Miner Res. 2010; 25 (10): 2101–2107. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.106.
19. Roux S., Cabana F., Carrier N. et al. The World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) underestimates incident and recurrent fractures in consecutive patients with fragility fractures // J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 99 (7): 2400–2408. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013–4507.
20. Setty N., Leboff M. S., Thornhill T. S. et al. Underestimated fracture probability in patients with unilateral hip osteoarthritis as calculated by FRAX® // J Clin Densitom. 2011, Oct-Dec; 14 (4): 447–452. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.06.001.
21. Balasubramanian A., Tosi L. L., Lane J. M. et al. Declining rates of osteoporosis management following fragility fractures in the U. S., 2000 through 2009 // J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96 (7): e52. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01781.
22. Mettyas T., Carpenter C. Secondary prevention of osteoporosis in non-neck of femur fragility fractures: is it value for money? A retrospective, prospective and cross-sectional cohort study // Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2013; 8: 44. DOI: 10.1186/1749–799 X-8–44.
23. Fraser L.-A., Ioannidis G., Adachi J. D. et al. Fragility fractures and the osteoporosis care gap in women: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study // Osteoporos Int, 2011; 22 (3): 789–796. DOI: 10.1007/s00198–010–1359–2.
Review
For citations:
Dobrovolskaya O.V., Toroptsova N.V. Adherence to treatment: influence on life quality and risk of repeated fractures in women in post-menopause after osteoporotic fracture. Lechaschi Vrach. 2018;(4):35. (In Russ.)
Views:
167
JATS XML
Email this article 
