Preview

Lechaschi Vrach

Advanced search

Clinical and epidemiological features of tick-borne encephalitis in adults in Novosibirsk in 2014-2023

https://doi.org/10.51793/OS.2025.28.6.013

Abstract

Background. Fundamental differences in the scale, overall picture of tick-borne encephalitis, the structure and quality of its clinical variants determine the need for regular analytical work and competent dynamic accounting of clinical, epidemiological and genetic data to make coordinated decisions on the prevention, diagnosis and therapy of tick-borne encephalitis.

Objective. The epidemiological and clinical manifestations of tick-borne encephalitis in adults hospitalized in the City Infectious Clinical Hospital No. 1 of Novosibirsk in 2014-2023.

Materials and methods. A retrospective clinical and epidemiological analysis of 870 cases of tick-borne encephalitis in adults for the period 2014-2023, an analysis of the results of sequencing of the sequencing material of patients who died from severe tick-borne encephalitis and a retrospective assessment of the effectiveness of specific prevention measures according to data from the state reports of Rospotrebnadzor of Novosibirsk region.

Results. Over the past 10 years, 870 adult patients with tick-borne encephalitis have been treated at City Infectious Clinical Hospital No. 1 of Novosibirsk. Every fifth case was characterized by the development of a focal form of tick-borne encephalitis with a severe course and high mortality (5,6 ± 0,6%). When analyzing the manifestations of the early tick-borne encephalitis period, it was revealed that the clinical forms retained the typical nature of the disease. Changes in cerebrospinal fluid are represented by two to three-digit cytosis with a predominance of lymphocytes (42%) or mixed pleocytosis. In the focal course of the disease, pleocytosis in half of the cases was polynuclear in nature. Late seroconversion was observed in 57.5% of fatal cases. According to sequencing of the sequencing material of deceased patients, in most cases, the Siberian subtype of tick-borne encephalitis was identified. Over the past 10 years, cases of tick-borne encephalitis have been reported annually among individuals receiving emergency immunoglobulin prophylaxis, of which 17% of patients subsequently developed focal forms. There were no tick-borne encephalitis vaccinees among these patients.

Conclusion. The incidence rate of tick-borne encephalitis in Western Siberia remained consistently high with a predominance of forms with CNS damage, in 58.6% of those who died from tick-borne encephalitis in the Novosibirsk region, a Siberian subtype was identified. The combination of clinical symptoms of the early tick-borne encephalitis period did not allow to determine the clinical variant of the course of the disease, severity and prognosis in the first days. A reliable method of prevention of tick-borne encephalitis is vaccination, prophylactic administration of anti-tick immunoglobulin does not protect against the development of focal forms and death.

About the Authors

Yu. V. Kazakova
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Россия

Yuliya V. Kazakova, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of Infectious Diseases

52 Krasny Prospekt, Novosibirsk, 630091



Ya. S. Ulyanova
City Infectious Diseases Clinical Hospital No. 1; Novosibirsk State Medical University
Россия

Yana S. Ulyanova, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Deputy Chief Physician; Assistant of the Department of Infectious Diseases

40 Semi Shamshinykh str., Novosibirsk, 630099

52 Krasny Prospekt, Novosibirsk, 630091



E. I. Krasnova
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Россия

Elena I. Krasnova, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Infectious Diseases

52 Krasny Prospekt, Novosibirsk, 630091



T. G. Burmistrova
City Infectious Diseases Clinical Hospital No. 1
Россия

Tatyana G. Burmistrova, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Neuroinfections Department

40 Semi Shamshinykh str., Novosibirsk, 630099



V. G. Kuznetsova
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Россия

Vera G. Kuznetsova, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Infectious Diseases

52 Krasny Prospekt, Novosibirsk, 630091



E. N. Usolkina
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Россия

Elena N. Usolkina, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Infectious Diseases

52 Krasny Prospekt, Novosibirsk, 630091



V. V. Provorova
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Россия

Veronika V. Provorova, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department of Infectious Diseases

52 Krasny Prospekt, Novosibirsk, 630091



P. N. Verchenko
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Россия

Polina N. Verchenko, Resident Physician

52 Krasny Prospekt, Novosibirsk, 630091



P. D. Urusova
City Infectious Diseases Clinical Hospital No. 1; Novosibirsk State Medical University
Россия

Polina D. Urusova, Infectious Disease Doctor; Assistant of the Department of Infectious Diseases

40 Semi Shamshinykh str., Novosibirsk, 630099

52 Krasny Prospekt, Novosibirsk, 630091



References

1. Kolyasnikova N. M., Zlobin V. I., Ishmukhametov A. A., Maleev V. V. The history of the discovery and study of tick-borne encephalitis in Russia: three Far Eastern expeditions (1937-1939). Terapevticheskii arkhiv. 2021; 93 (11): 1407-1412. (In Russ.)

2. Pogodina V. V., Ishmuhametov A. A. Evolution of tick-borne encephalitis (from the moment of discovery of the pathogen to the present). Moscow: ООО TFP, 2021. (In Russ.)

3. Zlobin V. I., Borisov V. A., Verkhozina M. M., et al. Tick-borne encephalitis in Eastern Siberia. Irkutsk: RIO VSCC SO RAMS, 2002. 184 р. (In Russ.)

4. Ierusalimskii A. P. Tick-borne encephalitis: A guide for doctors. Novosibirsk, 2001. 360 р. (In Russ.)

5. Borisov V. A,. Malov I. V., Jushhuk N. D. Tick-borne encephalitis. Novosibirsk: Science, 2002: 184. (In Russ.)

6. Skripchenko N. V. Tick-borne encephalitis in children (pathogenesis, clinic, diagnosis, treatment): a manual for doctors. St. Petersburg, 2006. 80 р. (In Russ.)

7. Kolyasnikova N. M., Ishmuhametov A. A., Akimkin V. G. The current state of the problem of tick-borne encephalitis in Russia and in the world. Epidemiologiya i vaktsinoprofilaktika. 2023; 22 (1): 104-123. (In Russ.)

8. Ruzek D., Županc T. A., Borde J., et al. Tickborne encephalitis in Europe and Russia: Review of pathogenesis, clinicalfeatures, therapy, and vaccines. Antiviral Research. 2019; 164: 23-51.

9. Клещевой энцефалит в XXI веке. Под ред. академика РАН В. И. Злобина. М.: Наука, 2021. 471 с. Zlobin V. I. Tick-borne encephalitis in the 21st century. Moscow: Science, 2021: 471 р. (In Russ.)

10. The TBE Book / G. Dobler, W. Erber, M. Bröker, H.-J. Shcmitt. 4th edition. Singapore: Global Health Press. 2021. 386.

11. On the state of sanitary and epidemiological wellbeing of the population in the Russian Federation in 2023: State report. M.: Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare. 2024. (In Russ.)

12. Dai X., Shang G., Lu S., et al. A new subtype of eastern tick-borne encephalitis virus discovered in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Emerging Microbes and Infectious. 2018; 7 (1): 71-74.

13. Ternovoy V. A., Kurzhukov G. P., Sokolov Y. V.,et al. Tick-borne encephalitis virus with haemorrhagic syndrome, Novosibirsk Region, Russia, 1999. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003; 9: 743-746.

14. Pogodina V. V., Karan L. S., Kolyasnikova N. M., et al. Polytype strains in the gene pool of tickborne encephalitis virus. Voprosy virusologii. 2012; 3: 30-36. (In Russ.)

15. Zhukova N. G., Komandenko N. I. Tick-borne encephalitis in the Tomsk region. Tomsk, 2002. 255 р. (In Russ.)

16. Decree of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation No. 4 of 28.01.2021 On Approval of Sanitary Rules and Norms of SanPiN 3.3686-21 Sanitary and Epidemiological Requirements for the Prevention of Infectious Diseases. (Registered 15.02.2021 No. 62500). (In Russ.)

17. Pogodina V. V., Shherbinina M. S., Semenov V. A., et al. Features of tick-borne encephalitis in vaccinated patients, criteria for specific laboratory diagnosis. Infektsionnye bolezni. 2020; 18 (4): 94-104. (In Russ.)

18. Kazakova Yu. V. Meningeal form of tick-borne encephalitis: clinical aspects of diagnosis and efficacy of leukinferon therapy: Dis.... cand.med. Sciences. Novosibirsk, 2007. (In Russ.)

19. Pogodina V. V., Shherbinina M. S., Kolyasnikova N. M., et al. Characterization of tick-borne encephalitis cases in vaccinees. Epidemiologiya i vaktsinoprofilaktika. 2019; 18 (6): 90-97. (In Russ.)

20. Clinical guidelines: Tick-borne viral encephalitis in adults]. Approved by the decision of the Plenum of the Board of the National Scientific Society of Infectious Diseases, 2014. 85 р. (In Russ.)

21. On the state of sanitary and epidemiological wellbeing of the population in the Novosibirsk region in 2016-2023. State reports. (In Russ.) https://54.rospotrebnadzor.ru/482.


Review

For citations:


Kazakova Yu.V., Ulyanova Ya.S., Krasnova E.I., Burmistrova T.G., Kuznetsova V.G., Usolkina E.N., Provorova V.V., Verchenko P.N., Urusova P.D. Clinical and epidemiological features of tick-borne encephalitis in adults in Novosibirsk in 2014-2023. Lechaschi Vrach. 2025;(6):87-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51793/OS.2025.28.6.013

Views: 77

JATS XML

ISSN 1560-5175 (Print)
ISSN 2687-1181 (Online)