Health indicators of children born after in vitro fertilization
https://doi.org/10.51793/OS.2024.27.9.004
Abstract
Background. The most important achievement in modern medicine is the widespread introduction of assisted reproductive technologies. In Russia, in vitro fertilization has acquired well-known advantages. The use of this method made it possible to solve the problem of infertility for a large number of families and satisfy a woman’s natural need for motherhood. At the same time, the ultimate goal – the appearance of healthy offspring – can only be achieved through the joint efforts of reproductive specialists: clinical and laboratory specialists. The justified purpose of this study was to determine the most significant indicators of the health of newborns in Astrakhan after in vitro fertilization in relation to indicators of maternal health.
Materials and methods. The health indicators and developmental characteristics of 109 children born after in vitro fertilization in the city of Astrakhan and the Astrakhan region on the period 2017-2022, as well as the morbidity of their mothers, were studied. Methods of clinical and laboratory examination and modern methods of statistical analysis were used.
Results. It has been established that multiple pregnancies after in vitro fertilization are more often observed in women who have a history of a greater number of various pathological conditions, mainly anemia of pregnancy, endocrine diseases accompanied by edematous syndrome and obesity, as well as virus carriage against the background of multiple attempts at fertilization. A certain number of newborns after in vitro fertilization (12.4% from singleton and 18.4% from multiple pregnancies) had somatic pathology, which was accompanied by iron deficiency anemia. However, the relationship between the number of fetuses in pregnancy after in vitro fertilization, the sex of the newborn and the occurrence of early anemia in newborns has not been statistically confirmed.
About the Authors
E. I. KashirskayaРоссия
Elena I. Kashirskaya, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Neonatology
121 Bakinskaya str., Astrakhan, 414000
V. N. Kuzmin
Россия
Vladimir N. Kuzmin, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery of the Faculty of Additional Professional Education, Head of the Center for Perinatal Infections
20/1 Delegatskaya str., Moscow, 127473
N. P. Provatar
Россия
Natalia P. Provatar, PhD student of the Department of Neonatology
121 Bakinskaya str., Astrakhan, 414000
N. Yu. Tanyushcheva
Россия
Nataliia Yu. Tanyushcheva, Dr. of Sci. (Econ.), Professor of theDepartment of Economics and Management
16 Tatishcheva str., Astrakhan, 414056
S. I. Shiryaeva
Россия
Svetlana I. Shiryaeva, pediatrician, Head of the Medical Rehabilitation Department
3; 61 Kulikova str., Astrakhan, 414041
A. B. Shagirova
Россия
Aliya B. Shagirova, Resident
121 Bakinskaya str., Astrakhan, 414000
L. A. Goncharova
Россия
Ludmila A. Goncharova, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Pediatric Surgery
121 Bakinskaya str., Astrakhan, 414000
References
1. Murzakhanova A. F., Oslopov V. N., Khazova E. V. Health status of children born after in vitro fertilization: probable risks and possible complications. Prakticheskaya meditsina. 2020; 3 (18): 43-50. (In Russ.)
2. Rusanova N. I. Assisted reproductive technologies in Russia: history, problems, demographic prospects. Zhurnal issledovanii sotsialnoi polotiki. 2013: 11 (1); 69-82. (In Russ.)
3. Zyuzikova Z. S., Volevodz N. N., Grigoryan O. R., Degtyareva E. I., Dedov I. I. The state of health of children born as a result of the use of assisted reproductive technologies: the position of an endocrinologist. Problemy endikrinologii. 2018; 64 (4); 235-243. (In Russ.)
4. Kasyanova G. V. In vitro fertilization in the natural cycle: opportunities and advantages. Autoref. Diss. kand. Moscow, 2019. 25 p. (In Russ.)
5. Belyaeva I. A., Namazova-Baranova L. S., Baranov A. A., Efendieva K. E., Karkashadze G. A., Dedyukina E. S., Serebryakova E. N., Konstantinidi T. A., Gogberashvili T. Yu., Molodchenkov A. I. Long-term development and health of children conceived with the help of assisted reproductive technologies. Voprisy sovremennoi pediatrii. 2022; 21 (2): 72-82. (In Russ.)
6. Ismaylova M. K. The significance of preimplantation genetic diagnostics in the in vitro fertilization program. Meditsinskii vestnik Bashkortostana. (In Russ.)
7. Dereje I., Etefa T., Gebremariam T., Getaye A., Tunta A., Gerbi A. Prevalence of Anemia and Associated Factors Among Term Newborns in Nekempte Specialized Hospital, Western Ethiopia. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021; 14: 2607-2615.
8. Jang D. G., Jo Y. S., Lee S. J., Lee G. S. R. Risk factors of neonatal anemia in placenta previa. International Journal of Medical Sciences. 2011; 8 (7): 554-557.
9. Lokeshwar M. R., Singhal T., Shah N. Anemia in the newborn. Indian J Pediatr. 2003; 70: 893-902.
10. Aher S., Malwatkar K., Kadam S. Neonatal anemia. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008; 13: 239-247.
11. Blanchette V. S., Zipursky A. Assessment of anemia in newborn infants. Clin Perinatol. 1984; 11 (2): 489-510.
12. Kates E. H., Kates J. S. Anemia and polycythemia in the newborn. Pediatr Rev. 2007; 28 (1): 33-34. DOI: 10.1542/pir.28-1-33.
13. Widness J. A. Pathophysiology of anemia during the neonatal period, including anemia of prematurity. Neoreviews. 2008; 9: e520.
14. Methods of statistical processing of medical data: Methodological recommendations for residents and postgraduates of medical educational institutions, researchers. Сomp.: A. G. Kochetov, O. V. Liang., V. P. Masenko, I. V. Zhirov, S. N. Nakonechnikov, S. N. Tereshchenko. M.: RKNPK, 2012. 42 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kashirskaya E.I., Kuzmin V.N., Provatar N.P., Tanyushcheva N.Yu., Shiryaeva S.I., Shagirova A.B., Goncharova L.A. Health indicators of children born after in vitro fertilization. Lechaschi Vrach. 2024;(9):34-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51793/OS.2024.27.9.004
JATS XML



















