Preview

Lechaschi Vrach

Advanced search

Difficulties in the diagnosis of Lyme disease in children. Clinical case

https://doi.org/10.51793/OS.2022.25.11.011

Abstract

Ixodid tick-borne borreliosis (Lyme disease) is an infectious disease common in areas inhabited by borrelias – potential causative agents of this pathology. Currently, about 20 genospecies of Borrelia are known, pathogenicity for humans has been proven for 4 of them, but this number continues to grow. The transmissible mechanism of transmission makes it possible to classify this disease as a natural focal infection, which makes this problem particularly relevant for the territory of Siberia and the Far East. The wide polymorphism of clinical manifestations, the complexity of specific diagnostics and the lack of information both for doctors and the general population often make it difficult to verify the diagnosis and often lead to late diagnosis, which carries the risk of developing chronic forms of the disease. Neurological manifestations of Lyme disease in children are usually characterized by the development of lesions of the central nervous system. Neuroborreliosis in pediatric practice is usually characterized by the development of serous inflammation of the dura mater, but requires specific antibiotic therapy. Late diagnosis of neuroborreliosis entails an increase in the number of complications and more frequent development of neurological deficit in the outcome of the pathological process. The article provides an observation of a clinical case of the development of Lyme disease in a child, characterized by a lesion of the central nervous system in the form of serous meningitis. Noteworthy is the absence of a verified fact of tick bite, an atypical course of the disease with an initial lesion of the central nervous system and the subsequent formation of a typical annular erythema. The delayed formation of the cardinal symptom of Lyme disease in the form of erythema annulare in the above clinical observation seriously complicates timely diagnosis, and makes it virtually impossible in the absence of the doctor's alertness and the availability of specific highly selective methods of etiotropic diagnosis. In addition, the article also demonstrates the difficulties of differential diagnosis against a comorbid background.

About the Authors

G. S. Karpovich
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Novosibirsk State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; State Budgetary Healthcare Institution of the Novosibirsk Region Children's City Clinical Hospital No. 3
Россия

Gleb S. Karpovich, Assistant of the Department of Infectious Diseases; infectious disease doctor

52 Krasny Prospekt, Novosibirsk, 630091

81 Okhotskaya str., Novosibirsk, 630040



D. S. Maramygin
State Budgetary Healthcare Institution of the Novosibirsk Region Children's City Clinical Hospital No. 3
Россия

Danil S. Maramygin, Pediatrician of the State Budgetary Healthcare Institution

81 Okhotskaya str., Novosibirsk, 630040



Yu. S. Serova
State Budgetary Healthcare Institution of the Novosibirsk Region Children's City Clinical Hospital No. 3
Россия

Yuliya S. Serova, Infectious disease doctor

81 Okhotskaya str., Novosibirsk, 630040



E. I. Krasnova
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Novosibirsk State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Россия

Elena I. Krasnova, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Infectious Diseases

52 Krasny Prospekt, Novosibirsk, 630091



I. V. Kuimova
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Novosibirsk State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Россия

Irina V. Kuimova, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor of the Department of Infectious Diseases

52 Krasny Prospekt, Novosibirsk, 630091



References

1. Sarksyan D. S., Maleev V. V., Platonov A. E. Differential diagnosis of tickborne borreliosis, caused by Borrelia miyamotoi // Infectious Diseases. 2012; 4 (10): 41-44. (In Russ.)

2. Szulżyk T., Flisiak R. Lyme borreliosis. Annals of Parasitology. 2012; 58 (2): 63-69.

3. Moore A., Nelson C., Molins C., Mead P., et al. Current guidelines, common clinical pitfalls, and future directions for laboratory diagnosis if Lyme disease, United States // Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2016; 22 (7): 1169-1177.

4. Sanchez E., Vannier E., Wormser G. P., Hu L. T. Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Lyme Disease, Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis, and Babesiosis A Review // JAMA. 2016; 315 (16): 1767-1777.

5. Scheld W. M., Whitley R. J., Marra C. M. Infections of the Central Nervous System, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004. P. 660-690.

6. Skripchenko N. V., Balinova A. A. Modern ideas about the pathogenesis of Ixodes tick-borne borreliosis. Journal Infectology. 2012; 4 (2): 5-14 (In Russ.)

7. Bumirgin S. V. Infection of Ixodes Persulcatus Schulze with pathogens of Lyme disease in Karelia // Transactions of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2008; 13: 41-44. (In Russ.)

8. Kuimova I. V., Radionova O. A., Krasnova E. I. Clinical features of ixodial tick-borne borreliosis in children // Lechaschi Vrach. 2014; 3. (In Russ).

9. Morbidity of the population of the Russian Federation by the main classes of diseases in 2000-2019 URL: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/zdrav/zdr2-1.xls.

10. Mygland A., Liostad U., Finqerle V., Rupprecht T., et al. EFNS guidelines on the diagnosis and management of European Lyme neuroborreliosis // European Journal of Neurology. 2010; 17: 8-16.

11. Skogman B. H., Sjöwall J., Lindgren P. E. The NeBoP score – a clinical prediction test for evaluation of children with Lyme Neuroborreliosis in Europe // BMC Pediatrics. 2015; 15: 214.

12. Balashov Yu. S. Ixodic ticks are parasites and carriers of infections. St. Petersburg, 1998.


Review

For citations:


Karpovich G.S., Maramygin D.S., Serova Yu.S., Krasnova E.I., Kuimova I.V. Difficulties in the diagnosis of Lyme disease in children. Clinical case. Lechaschi Vrach. 2022;1(11):66-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51793/OS.2022.25.11.011

Views: 648

JATS XML

ISSN 1560-5175 (Print)
ISSN 2687-1181 (Online)