Preview

Lechaschi Vrach

Advanced search

A modified method for assessing sexual function in women

https://doi.org/10.51793/OS.2025.28.8.009

Abstract

Background. Modern Russia, like many countries around the world, is undergoing a significant transformation of family and reproductive strategies, which is reflected in demographic and sexological trends. A comprehensive study of these interrelated processes requires the integration of demographic analysis methodologies, sociological research, and clinical data, emphasizing the relevance of interdisciplinary approaches in the field of public health. Sexual disharmony in couples, often caused by the presence of sexual dysfunctions in one or both partners, is an important factor in the destabilization of family relations and the aggravation of the demographic crisis. The diagnosis of sexual dysfunctions presents significant difficulties in clinical practice, largely due to their high comorbidity with somatic diseases and mental disorders. This fact is not always fully taken into account by doctors of non-core specialties, which makes it difficult to detect violations in a timely manner and organize early access to specialized care for patients. In this regard, the development and implementation of concise, reliable and valid screening tools for the prompt diagnosis of sexual dysfunctions is an important scientific and practical task.

Materials and methods. The study was conducted on the basis of the Department of Sexology of the Moscow Scientific Research Institute of Psychiatry. It was attended by 122 women of reproductive age. The main method was a questionnaire using two versions of the questionnaire for assessing female sexual function: the classical (full) version and a specially developed modified (abbreviated) version. The aim was a comparative study of the psychometric properties of the modified version.

Results. A modified (shortened) version of the female sexual function questionnaire has demonstrated high effectiveness as a screening tool for sexual dysfunctions in women. The study confirmed its high reliability, as evidenced by the Cronbach's index of internal consistency = 0.8141. The diagnostic accuracy of the abridged questionnaire was assessed as high based on the results of the ROC analysis (Area under the curve, AUC = 0.990), which indicates its ability to differentiate women with and without sexual dysfunctions. The shortened version retains the basic diagnostic capabilities of the full version.

Conclusion. The developed modified version of the female sexual function questionnaire is a convenient tool for practical healthcare. Its abbreviated format simplifies its use in clinical practice, especially by primary care physicians and related specialties (internists, gynecologists, urologists, psychiatrists) who do not have in-depth training in sexology. Focusing on key aspects of sexual function while avoiding excessive detail makes the tool convenient for rapid screening in a time-limited setting. This makes it possible to improve the early detection of sexual dysfunctions, timely refer patients to specialized sexologists for in-depth diagnosis and treatment, and, as a result, contribute to the prevention of family disharmony and improve the quality of life of patients.

About the Authors

M. I. Yagubov
Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry
Россия

Mikhail I. Yagubov, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Sexology

3 b. 10 Poteshnaya str., Moscow, 107076



I. Yu. Kan
Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry
Россия

Igor Yu. Kan, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher of the Department of Sexology

3 b. 10 Poteshnaya str., Moscow, 107076



N. V. Dobaeva
Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry
Россия

Naida V. Dobaeva, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Researcher of the Department of Sexology

3 b. 10 Poteshnaya str., Moscow, 107076



I. R. Ayriyants
Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry
Россия

Irina R. Ayriyants, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Researcher of the Department of Sexology

3 b. 10 Poteshnaya str., Moscow, 107076



References

1. The authorities have assessed birth rate trends in Russia up to 2026. RBC Economy, October 3, 2023. https://www.rbc.ru/economics/03/10/2023/651a95509a7947addf136c31. (In Russ.)

2. Arkhangelskii V. N., Kalachikova O. N. Women and men: Differences in fertility and reproductive behavior indicators. Sotsialnoe i ekonomicheskoe razvitie. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2021.5.77.10 (In Russ.)

3. Similarities and differences in the value orientations of husbands and wives based on the results of a simultaneous survey of spouses. Edited by A. I. Antonov. Moscow: Pero, 2021. 240 p. (In Russ.)

4. Landolt S. A., Weitkamp K., Roth M., Sisson N. M., Bodenmann G. Dyadic coping and mental health in couples: A systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2023; 106: 102344. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102344. Epub 2023 Oct 4. PMID: 37866090.

5. Hu B., Mao Y., Kim K. J. How social anxiety leads to problematic use of conversational AI: The roles of loneliness, rumination, and mind perception. Computers in Human Behavior. 2023; 145: Article 107760. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107760. [SSCI top 3% in Experimental Psychology, IF = 9.000]

6. Clayton A. H., Valladares Juarez E. M. Female Sexual Dysfunction. Med Clin North Am. 2019; 103 (4): 681-698. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.02.008. PMID: 31078200.

7. Moynihan R. The Making of a Disease: Female Sexual Dysfunction. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10965944_.

8. Ficek L., Miotła P., Rechberger T. Ocena jakościzycia seksualnego kobiet w badaniach klinicznych, przy uzyciu kwestionariuszy – przeglad dostepnych narzedzi, ich charakterystyka I porównanie właściwości [Women's sexual life quality assessment with use of questionnaires in clinical trials-review of accessible tools, their characteristics and comparison of their properties]. Ginekol Pol. 2005; 76 (12): 1000-1007. Polish. PMID: 16566382.

9. Giraldi A., Rellini A., Pfaus J. G., Bitzer J., Laan E., Jannini E. A., Fugl-Meyer A. R. Questionnaires for assessment of female sexual dysfunction: a review and proposal for a standardized screener. J Sex Med. 2011; 8 (10): 2681-706. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02395.x. Epub 2011 Aug 2. PMID: 21810182.

10. Althof S. E., Dean J., Derogatis L. R., Rosen R. C., Sisson M. Current perspectives on the clinical assessment and diagnosis of female sexual dysfunction and clinical studies of potential therapies: a statement of concern. J Sex Med. 2005; 2 Suppl 3: 146-153. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.00130.x. PMID: 16422791.

11. Vasilchenko G. S., Botneva I. L. General Sexopathology. Moscow: Meditsina, 2005. 511 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Yagubov M.I., Kan I.Yu., Dobaeva N.V., Ayriyants I.R. A modified method for assessing sexual function in women. Lechaschi Vrach. 2025;1(7-8):57-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51793/OS.2025.28.8.009

Views: 61

JATS XML

ISSN 1560-5175 (Print)
ISSN 2687-1181 (Online)