Evaluation of the results of treatment of kidney recipients at the outpatient stage against the background of minimizing immunosuppressive therapy
https://doi.org/10.51793/OS.2023.26.9.002
Abstract
Objective. To study the effect of immunosuppressive therapy based on a reduction in standard dosages and target values of tacrolimus concentrations on the results of the postoperative period in recipients with a transplanted kidney.
Materials and methods. The study included 176 kidney recipients who are under outpatient supervision of a nephrologist at the Samara Center for Organ and Tissue Transplantation. In accordance with the purpose and objectives of the study, the recipients were divided into two groups. The first group (control) included 78 patients receiving standard immunosuppressive therapy with calcineurin inhibitors (tacrolimus prolonged action) in combination with standard dosages of mycophenolic acid. The target concentration of tacrolimus in this group was 7-8 ng/ml. The second group (the main one) included 98 patients who received immunosuppressive therapy according to the tacrolimus prolonged action scheme in reduced dosages in combination with mycophenolic acid. The target concentration of tacrolimus in this group was 5-6 ng/ml. Both groups were comparable by gender, age, type and duration of stay on renal replacement therapy, as well as by the main diagnosis that led to chronic kidney disease.
Results. In the course of the study, it was revealed that the minimization of IST leads to an improvement in the long-term results of transplantation. In the late postoperative period, in the group with reduced doses and target values of tacrolimus concentration, the creatinine level remained significantly lower than in the control subgroup. There was also a significant difference in the glomerular filtration rate – in the study group it was significantly higher by 20% than in the control group. A decrease in the target concentrations of tacrolimus in the postoperative period significantly led to a decrease in the frequency of dose-dependent side effects, which subsequently led to a significant improvement in the quality of life of recipients in the control group.
About the Authors
E. V. ParabinaРоссия
Elena V. Parabina, nephrologist, Head of the Nephrology Department of the Clinics
89 Chapaevskaya str., Samara, 443099
O. V. Fatenkov
Россия
Oleg V. Fatenkov, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department and Clinic
89 Chapaevskaya str., Samara, 443099
M. N. Myakotnykh
Россия
Maksim N. Myakotnykh, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), surgeon of the Samara Center for Organ and Tissue Transplantation of the Clinics
89 Chapaevskaya str., Samara, 443099
A. A. Mironov
Россия
Aleksey A. Mironov, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Samara Center for Organ and Tissue Transplantation Clinics
89 Chapaevskaya str., Samara, 443099
A. G. Dodonov
Россия
Aleksandr G. Dodonov, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Deputy Chief Physician for Clinical and Expert Work of the Clinics
89 Chapaevskaya str., Samara, 443099
References
1. Jung H. Y., Cho S. Y., Choi J. Y., et al. Comparison of transplant outcomes for low-level and standard-level tacrolimus at different time points after kidney transplantation. Journal of Korean medical science. 2019; 34 (12): e103. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e103.
2. Пинчук А. В. Современные возможности индивидуализации иммуносупрессивной терапии. Трансплантология. 2012; (4): 52-55. DOI: 10.23873/2074-0506-2012-0-4-52-55. [Pinchuk A. V. Up-to-date potential of individualized immune suppression therapies. Transplantologiya. 2012; (4): 52-55. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.23873/2074-0506-2012-0-4-52-55.]
3. Томилина Н. А., Столяревич Е. С., Ким И. Г., Артюхина Л. Ю. Отдаленные результаты трансплантации почки в аспекте разных вариантов поддерживающей иммуносупрессии. Трансплантология. 2014; (3): 6-16. [Tomilina N. A., Stolyarevich E. S., Kim I. G., Artyukhina K. Yu. Long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation in terms of different variants of maintenance immunosuppression. Transplantologiya. 2014; (3): 6-16. (In Russ.)]
4. Шабунин А. В., Дроздов П. А., Макеев Д. А., Нестеренко И. В. и др. Персонализированный протокол назначения пролонгированной формы такролимуса реципиентам почечного трансплантата в раннем послеоперационном периоде. Вестник трансплантологии и искусственных органов. 2023; 25 (1): 52-61. DOI: 10.15825/1995-1191-2023-1-52-61. [Shabunin A. V., Drozdov P. A., Makeev D. A., Nesterenko I. V., et al. Personalized dosing protocol for extended-release tacrolimus in kidney transplant recipients in the early postoperative period. Vestnik transplantologii i iskusstvennykh organov. 2023; 25 (1): 52-61. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.15825/1995-1191-2023-1-52-61. (In Russ.)]
5. Orlando G. Finding the right time for weaning off immunosuppression in solid organ transplant recipients. Expert Review of Clinical Immunology. 2010; 6: 879-892. DOI: 10.1586/eci.10.71.
6. Thölking G., Schütte-Nütgen K., Schmitz J., Rovas A., et al. A low tacrolimus concentration/ dose ratio increases the risk for the development of acute calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity. J Clin Med. 2019; 8 (10): 1586. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8101586.
7. El-Agroudy A. E., Alarrayed S. M., Al-Ghareeb S. M., Farid E., et al. Efficacy and safety of early tacrolimus conversion to sirolimus after kidney transplantation: Long-term results of a prospective randomized study. Indian journal of nephrology. 2017; 27 (1): 28-36. DOI: 10.4103/0971-4065.176146.
8. Ульянкина И. В., Резник О. Н., Мойсюк Я. Г. Применение эверолимуса при трансплантации почек от доноров с расширенными критериями. Вестник трансплантологии и искусственных органов. 2009; 11 (4): 103-109. DOI: 10.15825/1995-1191-2009-4-103-109. [Ulyankina I. V., Reznik O. N., Moysyuk Y. G. The use of everolimus in kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors. Vestnik transplantologii i iskusstvennykh organov. 2009; 11 (4): 103-109. (In Russ, English abstract). DOI: 10.15825/1995-1191-2009-4-103-109. (In Russ.)]
9. Галеев Ш. Р., Галеев Р. Х., Хасанова М. И., Готье С. В. Сравнительный анализ протоколов индукции иммуносупрессивной терапии у реципиентов почечных трансплантатов (ретроспективный обзор). Вестник трансплантологии и искусственных органов. 2020; 22 (2): 44-52. DOI: 10.15825/1995-1191-2020-2-44-52. [Galeev S. R., Galeev R. K., Khasanova M. I., Gautier S. V. Comparative analysis of induction immunosuppressive therapy protocols in renal transplant recipients (retrospective review). Vestnik transplantologii i iskusstvennykh organov. 2020; 22 (2): 44-52. (In Russ, English abstract). DOI: 10.15825/1995-1191-2020-2-44-52. (In Russ.)]
10. Ghadimi M., Dashti-Khavidaki S., Khatami M. R., Mahdavi-Mazdeh M., et al. Comparing the effect of immediate versus delayed initiation of tacrolimus on delayed graft function in Kidney transplant recipients: A randomized open-label clinical trial. Journal of research in pharmacy practice. 2018; 7 (2): 69-76. DOI: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_17_90.
11. Liu Y., Liu H., Shen Y., Chen Y., Cheng Y. Delayed initiation of tacrolimus is safe and effective in renal transplant recipients with delayed and slow graft function. Transplant Proc. 2018; 50 (8): 2368-2370. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.101.
12. Park W. Y., Paek J. H., Jin K., Park S. B., Han S. Long-term Clinical Significance of Tacrolimus Trough Level at the Early Period After Kidney Transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2019; 51 (8): 2643-2647. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.03.065.
13. Jouve T., Rostaing L., Malvezzi P. New formulations of tacrolimus and prevention of acute and chronic rejections in adult kidney-transplant recipients. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017; 16 (7):845-855. DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2017.1328051.
Review
For citations:
Parabina E.V., Fatenkov O.V., Myakotnykh M.N., Mironov A.A., Dodonov A.G. Evaluation of the results of treatment of kidney recipients at the outpatient stage against the background of minimizing immunosuppressive therapy. Lechaschi Vrach. 2023;(9):15-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51793/OS.2023.26.9.002
JATS XML



















