Preview

Lechaschi Vrach

Advanced search

Dermatomyositis: difficuities of diagnostic search

https://doi.org/10.51793/OS.2023.26.5.003

Abstract

Dermatomyositis is a systemic disease, mainly of autoimmune Genesis, which is characterized by lesions of skeletal and smooth muscles, skin and mucous membranes. The multi-organ nature of the pathological process determines the polymorphism of clinical manifestations of the disease. In addition to pathognomonic symptoms for dermatomyositis, in the form of gradually increasing lesions of striated muscles, heliotropic rash, symptoms of Gottron and Keining, the disease is also characterized by a large number of malospecific changes. Often, hyperkeratosis, atrophy, vesicular-bullous and ulcerative rashes, dysphagia and reflux esophagitis, colitis and enteritis, pneumonia, fibrous alveolitis and hypoventilation syndrome, heart lesions become dominant. To date, the disease is considered as an idiopathic immune-mediated pathological process that develops in the presence of a genetic predisposition in response to the action of provoking environmental factors. Among hereditary markers of dermatomyositis, changes in the major histocompatibility complex, as well as in genes encoding cytokines, have been described. Trigger factors can be long-term chronic infections, physical and mental trauma, hyperinsolation, vaccination, and certain medications. Numerous cases of combination of dermatomyositis with oncological pathology and systemic connective tissue diseases are described in the literature. The scarcity and low specificity of the symptoms of the disease can lead to a long diagnostic search, while the involvement in the pathological process of several body systems makes patients turn to doctors of various profiles. Thus, dermatomyositis is an interdisciplinary problem, hence the increased awareness of doctors of related specialties can contribute to clinical alertness. In this regard, we present our own observation of a patient with dermatomyositis, which was accompanied by atypical rashes, polysyndromnostyu, as well as the absence of myositis-specific autoantibodies, which required an expanded laboratory and instrumental diagnosis (including to exclude paraneoplastic polymyositis).

About the Authors

M. M. Tlish
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Kuban State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Marina M. Tlish, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Dermatovenereology

4 Mitrofan Sedin Str., Krasnodar, 350063



Zh. Yu. Naatyzh
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Kuban State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Zhanna Yu. Naatyzh, MD, Associate professor of the Department of Dermatovenereology 

4 Mitrofan Sedin Str., Krasnodar, 350063



T. G. Kuznetsova
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Kuban State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Taisiya G. Kuznetsova, MD, Associate professor of the Department of Dermatovenereology 

4 Mitrofan Sedin Str., Krasnodar, 350063



References

1. Gadzhimuradov M. Clinical presentation of dermatomyositis // Klinicheskaya dermatologiya i venerologiya. 2017; 16 (4): 31-34.]

2. Orlova E., Plieva L., Pyatilova P., Novosartian M. Dermatomyositis: a clinical case and literature review // RMJ «Medicinskoe obozrenie». 2017; (11): 850-852.]

3. Dikareva E., Velichinskaya O. Dermatomiozit (clinical case) // Vestnik VGMU. 2019; 18 (2): 116-122.]

4. Starovoitova M., Desinova O., Guseva N. Scleromyxedema concurrent with dermatomyositis and paraproteinemia: A case report // Sovremennaya Revmatologiya. 2015; 1: 44-47.]

5. Tlish M. M., Kuznetsova T. G., Naatyzh Zh. Yu. Comorbidity as an interdisciplinary problem: the possibilities of forecasting // The Lechaschi Vrach Journal. 2020; 10: 55-58.]

6. Antelava O. Polymyositis/dermatomiositis: differential diagnosis // Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2016; 54 (2):191-198.]

7. Afanasiev M., Rybkina L., Sukhorukova E., Akhmerov S., Badeeva M. Dermatomyositis — masquerade of debuts // Prakticheskaya medicina. 2011; 7 (55): 164-167.]

8. Tlish M. M., Kuznetsova T. G., Naatyzh Zh. Yu. Polymorbidity in dermatovenereology: late diagnosis and consequences // The Lechaschi Vrach Journal. 2019; 7: 76-79.]

9. Pinal-Fernandez I, Mammen A. Dermatomyositis etiopathogenesis // Current opinion in rheumatology. 2018; 30 (6): 623-629.

10. Bogdanov I., Kazandjieva J., Darlenski R., Tsankov N. Dermatomyositis: Current concepts // Clinics in Dermatology. 2018; 36 (4): 450-458.

11. Lahoria R., Selcen D., Engel A. Microvascular alterations and the role of complement in dermatomyositis // Brain. 2016; 139 (7): 1891-1903.

12. James W., Elston D., Berger T., et al. Andrews’ diseases of the skin: clinical dermatology. 11th ed. London: Saunders Elsevier. 2011.

13. Gazeley D., Cronin M. Diagnosis and treatment of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies // Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease. 2011; (3): 315-324.

14. Ghazi E, Sontheimer R, Werth V. The importance of including amyopathic dermatomyositis in the idiopathic inflammatory myositis spectrum // Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013; 31 (1): 128-134.


Review

For citations:


Tlish M.M., Naatyzh Zh.Yu., Kuznetsova T.G. Dermatomyositis: difficuities of diagnostic search. Lechaschi Vrach. 2023;(5):17-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51793/OS.2023.26.5.003

Views: 357

JATS XML

ISSN 1560-5175 (Print)
ISSN 2687-1181 (Online)